A Study in Taste
⊆ 10:07:00 PM by AKBogert | ˜ 2 comments »"Art" is a relative term. It entails everything from the Mona Lisa to elephant dung chucked at a piece of canvas; from Disturbed to Lindsay Lohan (okay maybe not); from a single haiku to the Lord of the Rings trilogy; from Casablanca to Epic Movie; from Pong to Morrowind; it even includes cooking. And, when it comes to art, their is an artist and there is a consumer; the one who creates the art, and the one who, in whatever way it is meant to be taken in, sees, hears, touches, tastes or smells said art. The tools of the artist are his palette; the tastes of the individual are her palate. And, just like with paintings or food, our palates are often tolerable of a myriad styles and flavors. I have, over the course of a single week, viewed three very different movies, and like Anton Ego i shall, to the best of my ability, give you my opinion of the artists' works. And, for the record, i apologize for such a terrible introduction.
Transformers
2 hours 24 minutes
Shia LaBoeuf has, let's face it, come a long way since the preposterous shenanigans of Even Stevens. Unlike many child actors of his and past generations, i think it's important to condone LaBoeuf for moving on with a decent career after leaving the Disney set. His performance is quite convincing and overall, Transformers almost feels exactly like it ought to: real cars turning into realistic robots and creating a LOT of destruction. Despite my having not grown up watching the show, i experienced (as i'm sure many others have as well) a certain nostalgia-for-an-era-i-never-lived-in as Optimus Prime proudly emerged from his tractor trailer facade.
As aforementioned, i have never seen the original Transformers television show (in any of its incarnations) and consequently did not go into the movie with expectations so far as plot or characters went. In fact, i've been told by the more knowledgable of my friends that there are no real human characters in the show at all and that the events in the movie are really not a good representation of the series. I say: oh well. Instead, i went expecting amazing CG and humor. On that level, my expectations were met and then ante'd up a few notches. The naysayers can say whatever they want but there is no denying the incredible job done by the computer graphics teams on this movie. Perhaps my favorite scene is the opening attack on the military base, when the blackhawk turns into a mech and begins to absolutely pulverize everything in sight. The spin-off scorpion Decepticon is equally thrilling. As for the humor aspect, i found myself laughing even as characters were on the brink of death and dismemberment: the comedic timing is spot-on. The seemingly odd request of Barricade when he first finds Sam--are you ladiesman217?!--makes a frightening encounter quite entertaining, and this seems to be the method used most often in perilous circumstances throughout the film. A very awkward scene involving Sam and his parents is broken by one of the Autobots seeking permission to neutralize the annoying 'rents. That being said...
The same scene is unnervingly inappropriate. Sure, most of us laughed at the mother's very blunt inquiry--Sam...were you.......masturbating?--and her followup suggestion to rename the activity "Sam's happy time" for comforting purposes but let's face it: what sort of audience did the director's expect to come see Transformers? Was such material really appropriate for the children whose parents brought them out for what ought to have been a purely nostalgic romp with giant robots?
I recently saw a facebook group which rings all too true about the other major issue i have with Transformers. It was called "I went to see Transformers but all i saw was Megan Fox." I think that was the point. Forget all the innuendos and lewd joking that saturates the movie: the busty model con actress is unceasingly seen in sultry outfits which end far above the navel and are rarely ever buttoned for more than a few minutes at a time. Sure, Sam can look wherever he wants but i'm not keen on the constant zoom-ins on Fox's waist-line. Again, my main question is: why market this as a family movie and then contain so much more than young eyes ought to be bearing? There are a few marketing ploys i find distasteful; bait-and-switch takes the cake.
Overall, the movie was captivating but leaves very little after the fact. Reminiscing entails little more than "omg do your remember that part where some really flashy CG trick led to some other really flashy CG trick?!" and "i so wish my car only had one seatbelt and Megan Fox was in my car." It's a typical summer movie: a lot of glitz and glammer but in the end the only thing filling you up is the exorbitantly priced popcorn.
Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix
2 hours 18 minutes
Seeing as i rather dislike the whole inappropriate scene i opted to see this rather than I Now Pronounce You Chuck and Larry with my mother and siblings. My history with Potter's not too wonderful: i read the first two books before anyone else in my grade took an interest in reading and then when the controversy over the spiritual content of HP broke out in my church i was promptly forbidden to continue. Nevertheless a few years ago i saw the Goblet of Fire in theaters with some friends. So i came into the movie with no idea what happened in the third installment and very little idea what to expect from the Hogwarts crew this time around. Happily, the movie was pretty good.
When it comes to a movie based on a book--let alone, based on a book of such overwhelming popularity--it's mostly useless to summarize the plot of the film since any of you who care have already read the story. Thus you know about the witch of a witch who, wand by wand, takes over the entire school in the name of...well...i don't really know. All i can say is the actress, if she was indeed acting, pulled off an astoundlingly realistic portrayal of a woman i would happily shoot if handed a gun. That is to say, she was exceedingly annoying at first and slowly became a truly horrifying figure of tyrannical rule. Say what you might about Rowling, but if she wrote that character half as well as Staunton plays her, she deserves the acclaim she's received. The mood of the film is dastardly and cold, all the while keeping just enough hope so as not to crush you with the depressing state of the school and the world in general.
The thing that makes me happiest about the movie, though, is the moral lessons one draws from it. Obviously there's the importance of friendship and the idea that, although self-determination is good, we must sometimes count on others to back us up. You're not alone in life's battles. Etc. But what i most appreciated was the scene when Harry has Sirius (is that his name?)---Sirius' murderer at his disposal, and a voice inside is telling him that revenge is the right course of action, he resists the voice and is able to show mercy despite obvious natural inclinations. Furthermore, when Voldemort tries to consumer Harry with guilt and hatred, he is able to fight back on the premise that love, friendship and hope are always more powerful. And although i have my own opinions about the messages conveyed by the Potter series, it's hard to find much fault in the film. It's enjoyable, suspenseful and humorous at just the right moments, and it chills your heart before warming it at the end.
My only concern is, and you can consult me on the topic if you'd like, that Rowling's series is dangerous. Unlike, as many of my Potter-pushing peers suspect, the fear that exposure to the antics of Harry and co. will convince young viewers to convert to Wicca, my problem is quite the opposite. For i've noticed that, as the series becomes more widespread, an increasing number of people are perfectly fine with it on the basis that, after all, it's harmless fun and pure fiction. After all, when was the last time you saw someone fly past on a broomstick? No, my problem isn't that too many people are embracing Wicca. My problem is that too many people are ignoring it. Indeed, it seems that people have become desensitized to the reality of witchcraft and the forces of evil at work in our world. Harry Potter may not tell you to go out and buy a magic wand and a spellbook, but it does encourage a mindset in which hexes, malicious spirits and powerful dark lords are simply 'bad guys' in an imagination playground. They're not--these things are quite real, and have affected both myself and my family members in the past. Thus, go ahead and see Order of the Phoenix. But if a slight chill runs down your spine at the thought that "what if this were real?" don't write it off as air conditioning. Harry Potter is fun, but it's definitely not harmless.
Ratatouille
1 hour 50 minutes
From the moment a small Luxo lamp hopped across the screen and crushed an upper-case "i," the animation scene has never been the same. I am of course referring to the logo of now household name Pixar Studios, whose first major collaboration was brought to us by Disney under the simple title of "Toy Story." And every new release from this animation powerhouse leads me to believe that, when it comes to potential, Pixar's reaches 'to infinity..and beyond.'
As has become a staple since A Bug's Life, which brought us the classic man v. self chess action of "Geri's Game," Pixar films include an animated short before delving into the feature film. Thus i think it's important to mention "Lifted," the cute spin on alien abductions that the studio offers as a follow-up to "One Man Band," which showed before Cars. As usual, you think you know what's going to happen when you see a man asleep in his small country-side farm house as the giant flying saucer hovers outside. A tractor-beam catches the man, lifts him from his bed, and starts to carry him to the open window. Little do we know, however, that said tractor beam--indeed, the entire spacecraft--is, sadly, at the helm of a young alien in what might be construed as a sort of teenage road-test for martians. The many failings of said alien are pretty funny, but not overly so. Overall, i don't think "Lifted" is quite so good as previous attempts but, like much else of Pixar, can't be considered bad.
After the credits for "Lifted" roll, the French music begins to play and we are whisked away to beautiful Paris, where food is a passion for chefs everywhere; and, of course, a little rat named Remy. Anyone who's seen the advertisments knows the premise of the movie: a man who can't cook stumbles across a rat who can, and the two forge an unlikely friendship destined to take them to the top. Then there are the things i didn't know going into the movie but aren't really spoilers: said young man, who has been taken in as a plongeur, is secretly the heir of the famous restaurant, much to the chagrin of the hilarious midget chef depicted in the ads. Also, and i'm surprised he never even made it into any previews, there is the heartless food critic (with a fitting last name of "Ego") who has destroyed the restaurant's reputation once and seeks to do it again when the rat-aided chef starts to become popular. Throw in a mild romance and a troop of pseudo-mafioso ratpack relatives and you've got a recipe for success.
Ratatouille, in case you didn't know it, is an actual dish involving tomatoes, squash and onions, among other things. It's a vegetarian dish that i, after watching the movie, am actually quite interested in trying. The kitchen terminology-indeed, the accuracy of a legitimate chef and his crew-took me by surprise. Sure enough, included in the credits is a list of world-class chefs who oversaw the film to make sure that its presentation had just the right amount of oregano. The accents aren't terrible and it's fun when insignificant lines are muttered by various cooks in actual French, giving those of us who DIDN'T opt for spanish in grade school a smug sense of superiority over our baffled co-viewers.
The messages conveyed by the movie are definitely top-notch as well. Stealing is never okay, lying bears consequences, using others for selfish gain is wrong, and nobody's past the point of redemption. Indeed, as Potter taught us, having friends that stick by us is more important than anything else, even if your friend is a human. Overall, Transformers was decent and Phoenix intriguing, but when it comes to Pixar's latest: c'etait magnifique!






