So that was audition number two in my scintillating attempt to get on a stage (that is to say, while the curtain is not drawn). We'll see, tomorrow, how that fares, but in the meantime, some observations.
I have notoriously been harsh when it comes to the acting demographic. The division i noted was and shall always be in existence, however not nearly to the extent that my paranoid self claimed in earlier, less experienced postings. In our first acting class, the instructor noted the great importance of not shunning technicians, something i know all too well from having worked nothing but (tech, that is) in previous shows.
But when it comes to auditions, i'm stepping into actor territory.
And although theatre ought to be a fun place for people of all walks to gather, i understand that there are many who either a. are terrified of never getting stage opportunities again after leaving college, or b. need as full an acting resume as possible in aspirations for a career in the field. In either case, there are a limited number of positions on a cast and everyone auditioning ostensibly wants in. Friends or not, the moments before stepping out onto the stage each person has one thing on his or her mind: i'm going to put forth my best, and i sure hope it's better than everyone else's best.
And i understand that such feelings are mutual among actors. Allow me to step outside my usually narrow viewpoint to make the observation that tension even between the seasoned veterans of the acting troupe is fairly high. And then you throw someone like me, the technician, into the mix.
I imagine it's a rather humorous circumstance to be in, for the actor, seeing me walk through the door and fill out a sheet. It's as if we're awaiting tryouts for the high school track team, and everyone else a runner. They recognize me as someone whose experience with running the extent of which, to date, has been running the stopwatch. This almost guarantees that i've no acting chops (something i'll fully admit--this is all about experience at this point) and, for the most part, stand little chance of acquiring their part. Which allows for some small talk, some joking around, because i pose no threat whatsoever.
I like the idea though. The play we're doing this year is Shakespeare's "As You Like It," and from what i understand there are 20 male roles. Assuming that this includes fringe characters, i see myself not after any sort of leading role but simply a position that will get me used to being in front of an audience without giving me a chance to make a real fool of myself. You don't become CEO at a major corporation upon entering (unless you're Eisner)--you enter as the janitor, and maybe advance from there. Yet there's no clear way of suggesting your intentions when you audition--no mop and bucket to make clear what you're here for--and as such you must appear at least somewhat audacious as you take the stage and, in my case, fumble.
Let me clarify, before you jump on that word--fumble. I have never acted, and my last audition attempt was half-hearted (i'd like to think of this as more 3/4-hearted). Therefore i have no standard of comparison to judge my performance by, except that of the more seasoned performers. So when i say i fumbled, i mean only to say that the bit of practicing i did before a webcam in my dorm room this afternoon was tighter and a little bit more entertaining than what happened when i stepped before Ketler Auditorium this evening. Granted, i'd not planned to audition (i only signed up today around 2 p.m.) and as such i can't be expected to have prepared as diligently as those who've had their eyes set on a role since the day they stepped foot on campus this semester. Not really an excuse, but more of a slight reprieve for me.
As to the others auditioning, i indicated that my key reason for attending was to watch what i considered successful auditions (or not so successful, depending on your experience, i'd guess) and, either way, take notes on what struck me as well-done, something that i could try to emulate in the future (like, say, tomorrow when i audition for the one-acts). The list i compiled was somewhat short (there were not very many people left to audition after me) but here it stands:
Location-specific accents are a great way to showcase your abilities, if you have any. One performer had a great Southern drawl (far more developed--and, i should think, more oft-used--than the British accent i slobbered over during my take) and, despite the fact that this was a Shakespeare role, demonstrated her willingness to toss aside the normal speech patterns if her character had no use of them. I suppose my best accent is Aussie, so i ought to have gone for that (or maybe something French?).
Movement with purpose. That's it. Despite a minute amount of blocking i'd attempted in my dorm rehearsals, i remained almost frighteningly still on-stage. Hm... i guess that's stage fright, huh? I wasn't afraid to move, i simply forgot to. Speaking of which...
I also forgot about verbal pacing. The point of a good delivery versus a poor one is that the same words are presented in a different way. It's almost funny in hindsight that all of the pauses i took on-stage were supposed to be lines and all of the hurried lines i delivered were supposed to come after well-mimed pauses. No one prepares everything he is going to say ahead of time, and thus neither would any well-played character. This, i noticed, is perhaps the best mark of a good performer: the ability to speak in a way that allows you to forget they are reciting someone else's words.
Universal humor is another thing i ought to have considered. Granted, i had limited resources, but even then i forgot about the option to use film/television as subject matter for my comic piece. Desperately i scanned my bookshelf for something amusing and found a Bill Bryson book--a type of humor i find subtly hysterical--and selected a passage. The issue is that most people don't appreciate British humor, and Bryson's is usually drawn-out (thus impossible to fully demonstrate in a 60-second snippet). Which reminds me...
What was up with the time limit? I guess it was a frame of reference, but it seems that (based on the several-minute monologues delivered un-impeded by the director) the 60-second parameters were "more like guidelines than actual rules." In the future, i'll try to remember that time is not my master: it's better to have a longer piece with a bigger punch (and be prepared to stop if asked) than to be succinct and then awkwardly stop where the writer never intended you to do so.
That was pretty much all that i gathered from the other performers, although i noticed in reflection a major problem with my approach today. I made, it seems, the mistake of thinking that just because i like to (and often succeed at) making people laugh, my character doesn't necessarily need to be the jester. I find i am also drawn to violent, sinister characters, and so perhaps in the future i will attempt a villain rather than a hero.
Well, i just figured i'd let everyone know that i went out for another audition. In the excitement, i forgot to call home, which is kinda crappy, but there's always the weekend.
In the out-on-a-really-long-and-questionably-firm-limb event that i get a part, i'll update tomorrow (Friday, for those of you who aren't up til all hours of the night) with that info. Otherwise assume what i'm assuming now--that this has been naught more than a learning experience, and a good one at that.